In recent years, Ubisoft has really refined its approach to open-world games but has slowly begun shifting more and more games to RPG gameplay elements too. Perhaps the most obvious of this is theAssassin’s Creedfranchise, as whileAssassin’s Creed Valhallaattempts to bring old features like social stealth into its new RPG approach, it’s a far cry from what the franchise used to be. Ubisoft seems to be embracing RPG elements as a way to increase player engagement, and one of the most common elements is character customization.
Everyone loves character customization, and that’s all that really needs to be said. Projecting one’s self onto a video game character is incredibly empowering, but it’s not the only, nor the definitive best, way to bring characters to life. Games that focus on a rich narrative thrive because of how players can relate, not project, with characters. This is one reason that Ezio remains one of the most iconic figures in theAssassin’s Creedfranchise, despite not appearing in-game since 2011. AC fans can relate, love, and empathize with Ezio, while it seems Ubisoft wants them to project themselves onto more recent characters like Alexios,Kassandra, and Eivor.
RELATED:Far Cry 6 Narrative Director Clarifies That the Game is Political
However, that’s not always a possibility, as there are some games where RPG elements don’t mesh well. Character customization is one of those, no matter how limited or expansive it is, which brings players to a stark contrast: not only areAssassin’s Creed Valhalla’s andFar Cry 6’s character customizations completely differently, they seem to impact the game differently, one for the worse. Of course, there is the caveat thatFar Cry 6is not out yet, but it seems rather clear based on recently confirmed details thatFar Cry 6’s character customization may be more limited than, but is also ultimately better than,Assassin’s Creed Valhalla’s.
Male or Female Dani Rojas in Far Cry 6 Character Customization
Far Cry 6’s character customization, thus far, seems limited to choosing between male and female Dani Rojas. This could change, but it doesn’t seem like there will be facial construction, hair selection, or anything like that: just a simple choice. Even if it does change, it wouldn’t change the impact on the story. This makes sense when considering thatFar Cryis a first-person franchise and, therefore, players will hardly, if ever, actually seeDani Rojas. Now, it has been confirmed there will be gameplay and cinematics in third-person, allowing players to see their Dani and customization options, but it hasn’t really proven to be that deep yet. After all, these limits fit into a franchise where RPG elements mesh well, making it perfectly reasonable and seemingly well executed.
For the most part, protagonists are not the bread and butter of theFar Cryfranchise. WhileDani Rojas is voicedand that’s a big step from the past two games, it’s so players can project themselves onto the character in the loosest of terms. Obviously, this is good for the protagonist, but it’s not a standout feature of the franchise who or how players connect to their character. Vaas, Pagan Min, Joseph Seed, and the upcoming Anton Castillo fill that role; players who enjoyFar Crygames are more drawn to the appeal of the villain than, at least, most other story-oriented features. As such, this saw the recent entries in the franchise move away from naming them and trying to develop them; it just wouldn’t do much.
That’s to say nothing againstFar Cry 3’s Jason BrodyorFar Cry 4’s Ajay Ghale, but it didn’t hurt the franchise whenFar Cry Primal’s Takkar wasn’t really a relatable protagonist. The move to an unnamed protagonist withFar Cry 5’s deputy sheriff andNew Dawn’s Captain proved how, in this franchise, the main character is more of a vessel for storytelling than an actual character players should try to relate, project, or really put first. All of this wouldn’t work in some franchises, but by limiting character customization, giving the new character a voice, and still seeing Dani Rojas fulfill this role inFar Cry 6highlights all of the best of the franchise’s storytelling paired with customization.
Again, a lot of this is on paper, but it seems thatFar Cry 6’s Dani Rojas checks all the boxes because it simple makes sense for the franchise. On the other hand, well,Assassin’s Creed Valhallamay open up more customizationbut hurts the overall narrative in doing so.
RELATED:Far Cry 6 Fans Spot Vaas Bobblehead in the Game
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla’s Character Customization in Comparison
Far Cry 6’s character customization works because the protagonist, no matter how involved, is inherently decentralized. Overall, the franchise itself lends itself to this because of the emphases placed elsewhere. However, that does not and cannot work the same inAssassin’s Creed. The main character is always centralized and, from a roleplaying element, are meant to be loved, related to, and empathized with. Watching Ezio find Altair’s remains and then speak to Desmond worked because of how much investment players had in Ezio. People still jokingly honor Desmond’s sacrifice to-date because of how much they invested in him. Every player has a favorite assassin(or assassins, or non-assassin PCs), whether that’s Altair, Ezio, Connor, Aveline, Edward, Arno, Jacob, Evie, Shao Jun, Nikolai Orelov, Arbaaz Mir,Amunet/Aya, Bayek, Alexios, Kassandra, or Eivor, because the protagonists will always be central to the game’s conflict.
This begs bigger questions then of how characters can be customized, who, in-game universe, actually existed. Canonically, Kassandra was the Misthios, while Alexios was Deimos. Eivor Varinsdottir, a nameAC Valhallaconveniently forgets, is the one who walks around in-game. She is the Viking who sailed alongside the Brotherhood to England, but those big questions are neither here nor there. Ultimately, character customization is present inAssassin’s Creed Valhalla,but it has no presence inAssassin’s Creed Valhalla.
Changing genders at any time is confusing enough conceptually, but at the same time, the canon option means players are not the Viking on the cover but the real Eivor Varinsdottir for all except two story arcs. Its character customization muddies the differences betweenthe real Eivor and Havi, undermines and decentralizes the main protagonist, and limits how players can perceive the world. There’s a certain irony in the freedom of its character customization limiting how players connect to its characters.
Overall, though,Far Cryprotagonists could be swapped out with anyone, and the story would be as interesting. It could have been Jason Brody inFar Cry 4or Ajay Ghale inFar Cry 3, it could have been the deputy inFar Cry 3or it could be the deputy inFar Cry 6, or it could Dani Rojas inFar Cry 3, 4, and5, and it would have still worked. The environments and the villains lead the story; the protagonist is just a window to it.
The same cannot be said ofAssassin’s Creed: Ezio could not be the main character ofAssassin’s Creed Valhalla, Eivor could not be the lead ofEzio’s trilogy, and no protagonist could be swapped for another and the story be the same. As such, having this ability to character swap, to muddy the character’s identity, also serves to destabilize their central role. Moment to moment, it may be fine, but its consequence mean that several out there may know the name Dani Rojas or Ezio Auditore, but less will know the name Eivor Varinsdottir.
Far Cry 6releases on Jul 06, 2025, for PC, PS4, PS5, Stadia, Xbox One, and Xbox Series X.
MORE:The Odd Similiarity Between Far Cry 3’s Vaas and Resident Evil Village’s Lady Dimitrescu
